On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:20:54 +0800
> Tianwei wrote:
>
> > besides, the following warning indicated that developer already have
> > been aware of the problem and tolerate it:
> > 1. comments in worker.c:
> > a:
> > 896 requests_this_chi
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 15:20:54 +0800
Tianwei wrote:
> besides, the following warning indicated that developer already have
> been aware of the problem and tolerate it:
> 1. comments in worker.c:
> a:
> 896 requests_this_child--; /* FIXME: should be synchronized - aaron
> */
> b:
> 632
that a race condition bug?
besides, the following warning indicated that developer already have
been aware of the problem and tolerate it:
1. comments in worker.c:
a:
896 requests_this_child--; /* FIXME: should be synchronized - aaron */
b:
632 /* TODO: requests_this_child
besides, the following warning indicated that developer already have
been aware of the problem and tolerate it:
1. comments in worker.c:
a:
896 requests_this_child--; /* FIXME: should be synchronized - aaron */
b:
632 /* TODO: requests_this_child should be synchronized - aaron
Hi, httpd developers:
I am using a
tool(http://code.google.com/p/data-race-test/wiki/ThreadSanitizer) to
study the potential race condition bugs in httpd.
I use httpd-2.2.14, and configure with --mpm=worker. For my first
round of testing, it actually reports lots of warning. I am checking
one b
