David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any reason why we have the LIBTOOL value hard coded into httpd? I
ask as on beos using Jeff's libtool replacement we don't ever need to create
a libtool file in the apr directory, so when we try to build using that path
it fails. Shouldn't we be
Thanks. Still unsure about why we have the double detection though... surely
using the settings from APR is more correct?
david
David Reid [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there any reason why we have the LIBTOOL value hard coded into httpd?
I
ask as on beos using Jeff's libtool replacement
Is there any reason why we have the LIBTOOL value hard coded into httpd? I
ask as on beos using Jeff's libtool replacement we don't ever need to create
a libtool file in the apr directory, so when we try to build using that path
it fails. Shouldn't we be using the value that APR has detected and
