Re: Licensing claims (pcreposix)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:27:57PM -0600, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > I ran into the same headache with my complete rewrite of > the fnmatch.c logic of BSD that we ship in APR, and delivered > my rewrite of the file under both licenses. For which OpenBSD is still grateful, by the way :)

Re: Licensing claims (pcreposix)

+1 On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 4:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > I made a fundamental mistake as we removed PCRE from > the source tree of httpd; although we stopped distributing the > pcre library in 2.4.x source tree, our own util_pcre.c is largely > founded on the work of

Re: Licensing claims (pcreposix)

+1 > Am 20.02.2018 um 22:27 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > I made a fundamental mistake as we removed PCRE from > the source tree of httpd; although we stopped distributing the > pcre library in 2.4.x source tree, our own util_pcre.c is largely > founded on the work of

Re: Licensing claims (pcreposix)

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 10:27 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Any objections? +1

Licensing claims (pcreposix)

I made a fundamental mistake as we removed PCRE from the source tree of httpd; although we stopped distributing the pcre library in 2.4.x source tree, our own util_pcre.c is largely founded on the work of Philip Hazel/Cambridge; although the larger work doesn't need to be advertised in our LICENSE