r your help!
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2014 7:49 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Hi Yingqi,
thanks for sharing your results.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Lu, Y
Hi Yingqi,
thanks for sharing your results.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> I do not see any documents regarding to this new configurable flag
> ListenCoresBucketsRatio (maybe I missed it)
Will do it when possible, good point.
> Regarding to how to make small systems take
lavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 4:59 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Rebasing discussion here since this thread seems to be referenced in PR55897,
and the discussion has somehow been forked and c
to:yingqi...@intel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 9:10 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT
> on trunk
>
> Hi Yann,
>
> Thank you very much for your help!
>
> As this is getting better, I am w
tel.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 9:10 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on
> trunk
>
> Hi Yann,
>
> Thank you very much for your help!
>
> As this is getting better, I am wondering if y
Rebasing discussion here since this thread seems to be referenced in
PR55897, and the discussion has somehow been forked and continued in
[1].
[1].
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/201410.mbox/%3c9acd5b67aac5594cb6268234cf29cf9aa37e9...@orsmsx113.amr.corp.intel.com%3E
On Sat, O
: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 9:10 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Hi Yann,
Thank you very much for your help!
As this is getting better, I am wondering if you guys have plan
take advantage of it.
Thanks,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:29 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Hi Yingqi,
commited in r1635521, with some changes
:
> Thank you very much for your help!
>
> Thanks,
> Yingqi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:34 AM
> To: httpd
> Subject: Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on
Thank you very much for your help!
Thanks,
Yingqi
-Original Message-
From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 10:34 AM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Hi Yingqi,
I'm working
sponses below.
>
> Thanks,
> Yingqi
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Lu, Yingqi [mailto:yingqi...@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 4:56 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on
> trunk
>
&g
: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Dear All,
Attached patch is generated based on current trunk. It covers for
prefork/worker/event/eventopt MPM. It supposes to address following issues
regarding to SO_RESUEPORT support vs. current trunk ve
t: RE: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Dear All,
Attached patch is generated based on current trunk. It covers for
prefork/worker/event/eventopt MPM. It supposes to address following issues
regarding to SO_RESUEPORT support vs. current trunk version:
1. Sa
.
>
> Please be aware that existing AP_DECLAREd functions API must not change
> though.
>
> Regards,
> Yann.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yingqi
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic....@gmail.com]
>> Sent
t;> though.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Yann.
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yingqi
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 4:19 PM
ions API must not change
> though.
>
> Regards,
> Yann.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Yingqi
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Yann Ylavic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 4:19 PM
>> To: httpd
@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 5:04 PM
To: httpd
Subject: Re: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 1:50 AM, Lu, Yingqi wrote:
> Here is what I think. Currently (trunk version as well as my original
> patch),
>
>
[mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 4:19 PM
> To: httpd
> Subject: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
>
> Hi,
>
> some notes about the current implementation of this (trunk only).
>
> First, whether or not SO_REUSEP
vic [mailto:ylavic@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 4:19 PM
To: httpd
Subject: Listeners buckets and duplication w/ and w/o SO_REUSEPORT on trunk
Hi,
some notes about the current implementation of this (trunk only).
First, whether or not SO_REUSEPORT is available, we do duplicate
Hi,
some notes about the current implementation of this (trunk only).
First, whether or not SO_REUSEPORT is available, we do duplicate the listeners.
This, I think, is not the intention of Yingqi Lu's original proposal,
and probably my fault since I asked for the patch to be splitted in
two for a
20 matches
Mail list logo
