"Rodent of Unusual Size" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -1 for 1.3. (Yes, that is a retroactive veto.) It breaks
> checkout as it currently stands (which could be fixed), and
> certainly violates the Principle of Least Astonishment for
> people upgrading from 1.3.20 or earlier.
Thanks for bringi
> -1 for 1.3. (Yes, that is a retroactive veto.) It breaks
> checkout as it currently stands (which could be fixed), and
then it's no problem.
> certainly violates the Principle of Least Astonishment for
> people upgrading from 1.3.20 or earlier.
the onw how can read should look into Changes whe
-1 for 1.3. (Yes, that is a retroactive veto.) It breaks
checkout as it currently stands (which could be fixed), and
certainly violates the Principle of Least Astonishment for
people upgrading from 1.3.20 or earlier.
+1 for 2.0.
--
#kenP-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.
From: "Lars Eilebrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:47 PM
> According to Martin Kraemer:
>
> > In other words, I propose to move /manual up one directoryy level,
> > side by side with /icons:
> > @@ServerRoot@@/htdocs/...
> > @@ServerRoot@@/icons/...
> >
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
>
> This makes sense, but then we should move htdocs/error/ one
> level up, too. IMHO the server root gets cluttered up more and more
> if we do this.
OtherBill already moved the error directory.
Joshua.
According to Martin Kraemer:
> In other words, I propose to move /manual up one directoryy level,
> side by side with /icons:
> @@ServerRoot@@/htdocs/...
> @@ServerRoot@@/icons/...
> @@ServerRoot@@/manual/...
This makes sense, but then we should move htdocs/error/ one
level up, too
> In other words, I propose to move /manual up one directoryy level,
> side by side with /icons:
>@@ServerRoot@@/htdocs/...
>@@ServerRoot@@/icons/...
>@@ServerRoot@@/manual/...
> Then we really don't need to worry about overwriting the /manual
> directory during installation (we don't
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Martin Kraemer wrote:
> In other words, I propose to move /manual up one directoryy level,
> side by side with /icons:
>@@ServerRoot@@/htdocs/...
>@@ServerRoot@@/icons/...
>@@ServerRoot@@/manual/...
>
> Then we really don't need to worry about overwriting the /man
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Martin Kraemer wrote:
>
> I would propose to handle /manual quite similar to /icons as a read-only
> resource which is part of the server, not part of the documentroot.
>
+1
Joshua.
From: "Martin Kraemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:52 AM
> In the configuration file, we have:
>
> > #
> > # This should be changed to the ServerRoot/htdocs/manual/. The alias provides
> > # the manual, even if you choose to move your DocumentRoot. You may comment
>
In the configuration file, we have:
> #
> # This should be changed to the ServerRoot/htdocs/manual/. The alias provides
> # the manual, even if you choose to move your DocumentRoot. You may comment
> # this out if you do not care for the documentation.
> #
> Alias /manual "@@ServerRoot@@/htdocs
11 matches
Mail list logo