Re: Location of /manual

2001-09-15 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"Rodent of Unusual Size" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -1 for 1.3. (Yes, that is a retroactive veto.) It breaks > checkout as it currently stands (which could be fixed), and > certainly violates the Principle of Least Astonishment for > people upgrading from 1.3.20 or earlier. Thanks for bringi

Re: Location of /manual

2001-09-15 Thread Günter Knauf
> -1 for 1.3. (Yes, that is a retroactive veto.) It breaks > checkout as it currently stands (which could be fixed), and then it's no problem. > certainly violates the Principle of Least Astonishment for > people upgrading from 1.3.20 or earlier. the onw how can read should look into Changes whe

Re: Location of /manual

2001-09-14 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-1 for 1.3. (Yes, that is a retroactive veto.) It breaks checkout as it currently stands (which could be fixed), and certainly violates the Principle of Least Astonishment for people upgrading from 1.3.20 or earlier. +1 for 2.0. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.

Re: Location of /manual

2001-08-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Lars Eilebrecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:47 PM > According to Martin Kraemer: > > > In other words, I propose to move /manual up one directoryy level, > > side by side with /icons: > > @@ServerRoot@@/htdocs/... > > @@ServerRoot@@/icons/... > >

RE: Location of /manual

2001-08-23 Thread Joshua Slive
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Lars Eilebrecht wrote: > > This makes sense, but then we should move htdocs/error/ one > level up, too. IMHO the server root gets cluttered up more and more > if we do this. OtherBill already moved the error directory. Joshua.

RE: Location of /manual

2001-08-23 Thread Lars Eilebrecht
According to Martin Kraemer: > In other words, I propose to move /manual up one directoryy level, > side by side with /icons: > @@ServerRoot@@/htdocs/... > @@ServerRoot@@/icons/... > @@ServerRoot@@/manual/... This makes sense, but then we should move htdocs/error/ one level up, too

Re: Location of /manual

2001-08-23 Thread Günter Knauf
> In other words, I propose to move /manual up one directoryy level, > side by side with /icons: >@@ServerRoot@@/htdocs/... >@@ServerRoot@@/icons/... >@@ServerRoot@@/manual/... > Then we really don't need to worry about overwriting the /manual > directory during installation (we don't

Re: Location of /manual

2001-08-23 Thread Rich Bowen
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Martin Kraemer wrote: > In other words, I propose to move /manual up one directoryy level, > side by side with /icons: >@@ServerRoot@@/htdocs/... >@@ServerRoot@@/icons/... >@@ServerRoot@@/manual/... > > Then we really don't need to worry about overwriting the /man

Re: Location of /manual

2001-08-23 Thread Joshua Slive
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Martin Kraemer wrote: > > I would propose to handle /manual quite similar to /icons as a read-only > resource which is part of the server, not part of the documentroot. > +1 Joshua.

Re: Location of /manual

2001-08-23 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Martin Kraemer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:52 AM > In the configuration file, we have: > > > # > > # This should be changed to the ServerRoot/htdocs/manual/. The alias provides > > # the manual, even if you choose to move your DocumentRoot. You may comment >

Location of /manual

2001-08-23 Thread Martin Kraemer
In the configuration file, we have: > # > # This should be changed to the ServerRoot/htdocs/manual/. The alias provides > # the manual, even if you choose to move your DocumentRoot. You may comment > # this out if you do not care for the documentation. > # > Alias /manual "@@ServerRoot@@/htdocs