I think I just came up with a clever solution. However web browsers
will have to support srv records
the problem with virtual hosts is that you can have only one ssl
certificate per port (443)
because ssl requires it encrypted before it sends any other information.
A solution is to run a different
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 03:21, Jeff Sadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think I just came up with a clever solution. However web browsers
> will have to support srv records
> the problem with virtual hosts is that you can have only one ssl
> certificate per port (443)
> because ssl requires i
I'm not sure if any browser available currently support this, but I
suppose none. Maybe if it became RFC, you might get Mozilla folks
interested with this :)
As far as I know, Mozilla guys are hanging out for TLS/SNI, as is the
rest of the world. They and the other browsers have been ready f
