Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-04-17 Thread Pierre Joye
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Akins, Brian brian.ak...@turner.com wrote: On 4/15/11 6:11 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 15.04.2011 23:01, schrieb Jeff Trawick: FastCGI is a way to get us out of all sorts of dark alleys; let's be sure to keep it in mind as one of the

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-04-16 Thread Akins, Brian
On 4/15/11 6:11 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: Am 15.04.2011 23:01, schrieb Jeff Trawick: FastCGI is a way to get us out of all sorts of dark alleys; let's be sure to keep it in mind as one of the tools to address binary compatibility issues, PHP-centered or not but

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-04-15 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: PHP5.3.6 was just released, and the Windows binaries are built with VC9, meaning that it won't work with our Windows binaries. I know that it's been discussed before, and there's a plan to move to VC9, but as of last week

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-04-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.04.2011 23:01, schrieb Jeff Trawick: FastCGI is a way to get us out of all sorts of dark alleys; let's be sure to keep it in mind as one of the tools to address binary compatibility issues, PHP-centered or not but you can not use .htaccess with cgi what is the main reason using

PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Rich Bowen
I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users. PHP5.3.6 was just released, and the Windows binaries are built with VC9, meaning that it won't

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread wahoocra...@gmail.com
message - From: Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com Date: Fri, Mar 18, 2011 10:24 Subject: PHP5.3.6 To: dev@httpd.apache.org I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it *feels* like our problem to me

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:24 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users. PHP5.3.6 was just

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Rich Bowen
On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: I don't think we should ever point to third party httpd downloads. Let those offering binaries compete in the same way as Ubuntu, Fedora, etc. I think in general that the Apache-on-Windows user community offers up a relatively small amount

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/18/2011 04:12 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: What would it take, from our side or from Stefan's, to make it ok for us to say go here for Windows binaries? It surely seems that this would be a big win for both of us. AFAICT they do not

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: I don't think we should ever point to third party httpd downloads. Let those offering binaries compete in the same way as Ubuntu, Fedora, etc. I think in general that

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our stable-ABI builds +1 Regards -- ^TM

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Rich Bowen
On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our stable-ABI builds +1 Doing that without suggesting an

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/18/2011 04:55 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP binaries for Windows starting with 5.3.6 no longer work with our stable-ABI builds +1

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Graham Dumpleton
On 18 March 2011 07:24, Rich Bowen rbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users. PHP5.3.6 was just released

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Mladen Turk
On 03/18/2011 05:19 PM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: On 18 March 2011 07:24, Rich Bowenrbo...@rcbowen.com wrote: If I read this right, this is a similar issue to what we have in the Python world with some Python extension modules on Windows. One discussion thread about it can be found at:

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread Rich Bowen
On Mar 18, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 03/18/2011 04:55 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: On Mar 18, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 03/18/2011 04:43 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: what if we add text to our download that says that official PHP binaries for Windows starting with

Re: PHP5.3.6

2011-03-18 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 3/18/2011 9:24 AM, Rich Bowen wrote: I wanted to be sure that folks are aware of what's going on in the Windows/PHP world. I know that, in one sense, it's not our problem, but it *feels* like our problem to me, and to many of our users. Quite honestly, this leaves me with a taste to