On 04/02/2006 12:27 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> yep ;)
>
> I'll move the patch to trunk, change it to return OK where original
> patch returned r->status, integrate your logging patch, and commit, if
> it holds up under more varied testing.
>
Thanks.
On 4/1/06, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 03/31/2006 06:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> >
> > Some concerns about the else path:
> >
> > a) is 500 proper? should it just return OK instead?
>
> I think 500 is good.
>
> >
> > b) what about logging that path to ensure that the admi
On 03/31/2006 06:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> Some concerns about the else path:
>
> a) is 500 proper? should it just return OK instead?
I think 500 is good.
>
> b) what about logging that path to ensure that the administrator has
> some help diagnosing the problem, since we can't carry
Some discussion has taken place in bugzilla but more discussion and
opinions are needed.
A patch recently posted:
Index: server/core.c
===
--- server/core.c (revision 386843)
+++ server/core.c (working copy)
@@ -3645,7 +3
