On Wednesday 30 November 2011, Tim Bannister wrote:
> On 27 Nov 2011, at 17:14, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we
> > should use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around
> > 2700 calls to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number
On 27 Nov 2011, at 17:14, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should use a
> distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls to
> *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together with for
> example AH as prefix f
On Tuesday 29 November 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 11/27/2011 8:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages
> > could be made more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two
> > suggestions were made - adding a URL to the message or adding a
On 11/27/2011 8:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages could be made
more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two suggestions were made - adding
a URL to the message or adding a number/code to each error that would then be
looked up for more
On 27.11.2011 12:14, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should
use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls
to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together
with for example AH as prefix for "Apache HTTP
Am 27.11.2011 18:14, schrieb Stefan Fritsch:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should
use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls
to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together
with for example AH as prefix for "Apache HT
On Nov 27, 2011, at 12:58, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> Thanks for the suggestion of the odd format. That seems very reasonable.
Clearly I need to stop writing email on my phone. The CODE format.
On Nov 27, 2011, at 12:14, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should
> use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls
> to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together
> with for example AH as prefi
On Sunday 27 November 2011, Rich Bowen wrote:
> At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages could
> be made more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two
> suggestions were made - adding a URL to the message or adding a
> number/code to each error that would then be looked up f
On 11/27/2011 8:34 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages could be made
> more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two suggestions were made -
> adding a URL to the message or adding a number/code to each error that would
> then be looked up for
At Apachecon several of us were discussing how error messages could be made
more helpful without making them paragraphs. Two suggestions were made - adding
a URL to the message or adding a number/code to each error that would then be
looked up for more information.
Any thoughts on 1) the wisdom
11 matches
Mail list logo
