Re: Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread Eric Covener
> So I plan to start a vote an switching mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR. Please let > me know your objections if there are any. +1

Re: Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread Daniel Gruno
On 06/07/2013 07:53 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > +1... this thread is sufficient for voting :) > +1 in that case! :) With regards, Daniel > > On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Guenter Knauf > wrote: > > On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote: > > mod

Re: Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
+1... this thread is sufficient for voting :) On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote: > >> mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to >> be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to >>

Re: Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread Guenter Knauf
On 07.06.2013 18:26, Rainer Jung wrote: mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to allow incompatible changes. Now that a few of us are working on it I expect it would be useful if backports could

Proposal: switch mod_lua in 2.4 to CTR

2013-06-07 Thread Rainer Jung
mod_lua is still marked experimental because we did not yet expect it to be complete or the APIs to be stable. So we did expect and wanted to allow incompatible changes. Now that a few of us are working on it I expect it would be useful if backports could be done quicker for some time until we thi