Le 17/06/2016 à 14:35, Ruediger Pluem a écrit :
On 06/17/2016 02:24 PM, Marion et Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Hi,
The code in trunk and 2.4 don't have the 3 last lines:
memcpy(eval->gspend, sz, len + 1);
/* hspend will now point to NULL character */
eval->gspend += len;
S
Am 17.06.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Ruediger Pluem:
On 06/16/2016 10:33 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
Hi,
I'm not familiar with sed implementation, but 'copy_to_genbuf' looks spurious.
Actually it only expands a buffer if some space is needed, but nothing is
copied.
Should it look like:
stat
>
>
> CJ
>
> > Message du 17/06/16 12:00
> > De : "Ruediger Pluem"
> > A : dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: Question about mod_sed
> >
> >
> >
> > On 06/16/2016 10:33 PM, Christop
iew=markup#l231
The code in my first post is what I think is correct.
Sorry for not being clear.
CJ
> Message du 17/06/16 12:00
> De : "Ruediger Pluem"
> A : dev@httpd.apache.org
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: Question about mod_sed
>
>
>
> On 0
On 06/16/2016 10:33 PM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm not familiar with sed implementation, but 'copy_to_genbuf' looks spurious.
>
> Actually it only expands a buffer if some space is needed, but nothing is
> copied.
>
>
> Should it look like:
>
> static void copy_to_genbuf(sed
Hi,
I'm not familiar with sed implementation, but 'copy_to_genbuf' looks
spurious.
Actually it only expands a buffer if some space is needed, but nothing
is copied.
Should it look like:
static void copy_to_genbuf(sed_eval_t *eval, const char* sz)
{
int len = strlen(sz);
unsigned
