RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Apache SSL Feature - Please Advise (PATCH for mod_ssl)

2004-12-14 Thread TAYLOR, TIM \(CONTRACTOR\)
, December 13, 2004 11:59 AM To: TAYLOR, TIM (CONTRACTOR) Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Apache SSL Feature - Please Advise (PATCH for mod_ssl) On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 04:33:15PM -0500, TAYLOR, TIM (CONTRACTOR) wrote: > Thanks, Joe. > > >Neither of the backwards-

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Apache SSL Feature - Please Advise (PATCH for mod_ssl)

2004-12-13 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 04:33:15PM -0500, TAYLOR, TIM (CONTRACTOR) wrote: > Thanks, Joe. > > >Neither of the backwards-incompatible solutions look particularly > >desirable. I can't think of a better way than Patch 3 really. It would > >be nice if there was some way of just picking out the DNs b

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Apache SSL Feature - Please Advise (PATCH for mod_ssl)

2004-12-10 Thread TAYLOR, TIM \(CONTRACTOR\)
Thanks, Joe. >Neither of the backwards-incompatible solutions look particularly >desirable. I can't think of a better way than Patch 3 really. It would >be nice if there was some way of just picking out the DNs by name from >the already configured SSLCACertificate* chain e.g. > > SSLCADNReques

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: Apache SSL Feature - Please Advise (PATCH for mod_ssl)

2004-12-10 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 01:24:29PM -0500, TAYLOR, TIM (CONTRACTOR) wrote: > I have attached three patch versions. Writing the code is not nearly > as difficult as figuring out the best way to go. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not the best place to discuss this; I'm following up to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (A