On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:47:34AM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [SNIP]
> >Nice! So this is the fix for #26562? Don't forget to update
> >the comment
> >before you commit, and it looks like this is a new flag sinc
>-Original Message-
>From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
>Nice! So this is the fix for #26562? Don't forget to update
>the comment
>before you commit, and it looks like this is a new flag since OpenSSL
>0.9.6h so should use a compatibility ifdef:
>
Just to make sure this is
>-Original Message-
>From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[SNIP]
>
>Nice! So this is the fix for #26562? Don't forget to update
>the comment
>before you commit, and it looks like this is a new flag since OpenSSL
>0.9.6h so should use a compatibility ifdef:
>
>#ifndef SSL_SESS_CACHE_N
On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 03:28:38PM -0800, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
> Hello,
> Apart from flagging OpenSSL to NOT lookup the internal cache for
> session-id's, we should ALSO tell OpenSSL to NOT store the
> sessions ! This fixes my problem where the httpd process size
>
On March 25, 2004 06:28 pm, Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote:
> Apart from flagging OpenSSL to NOT lookup the internal cache for
> session-id's, we should ALSO tell OpenSSL to NOT store the sessions !
> This fixes my problem where the httpd process size keeps increasing
> when SSLVerifyClient is