On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:23:58PM -0600, Charles Randall wrote:
> The attached patch against 2.0.25 makes "make distclean" remove these files
> with the exception of the stuff in the os/beos and os/os2 directories (there
> wasn't a framework in place).
>
> I tested using,
>
> configure
>
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated
>files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances. We
>also don't remove build.mk because it is like a Makefile (which we
>don't seem to remove).
Hmm. Am I th
On Friday 31 August 2001 10:31, Charles Randall wrote:
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated
> >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances. We
> >also don't remove build.mk because it is
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Charles Randall wrote:
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated
> >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstances. We
> >also don't remove build.mk because it is like a Make
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 10:38:39AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Friday 31 August 2001 10:31, Charles Randall wrote:
> > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated
> > >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) un
On Friday 31 August 2001 10:42, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Charles Randall wrote:
> > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files or certain generated
> > >files (exports.c seems to come to mind) under any circumstan
On Friday 31 August 2001 10:47, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 10:38:39AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Friday 31 August 2001 10:31, Charles Randall wrote:
> > > From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >
> > > >FWIW, we should not remove the config.nice files o
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
>...
> exports.c shouldn't be cleaned, correct, because it is a part of the
> distribution, or at least it should be if it isn't already. config.nice is
> not a part of the distribution however, and should be removed by
> make distclean.
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >...
> > exports.c shouldn't be cleaned, correct, because it is a part of the
> > distribution, or at least it should be if it isn't already. config.nice
On Friday 31 August 2001 19:31, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM
>
> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > >...
> > > exports.c shouldn't be cleaned, correct, because it is a part of the
> > > d
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:16:15PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Friday 31 August 2001 19:31, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 03:02:32PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > >...
> > > > ex
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:22:00AM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
> I use distclean on my computer all the time. Along with extraclean. Neither
> of those targets should toss config.nice. *That* is what I mean.
>
> To be clear: nothing in our build/config/whatever should remove config.nice
+1. -- jus
From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 3:22 AM
> I use distclean on my computer all the time. Along with extraclean. Neither
> of those targets should toss config.nice. *That* is what I mean.
>
> To be clear: nothing in our build/config/whatever should remove co
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Which means it has nothing to do with cleaning the tree to a
> distribution state (or state 'ready for distribution'.)
See, I think that's the difference of interpretation here. *I* interpret
distclean to mean not "ready for distribution" but "b
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:25:07PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Which means it has nothing to do with cleaning the tree to a
> > distribution state (or state 'ready for distribution'.)
>
> See, I think that's the difference of interpretation he
On Sunday 02 September 2001 10:28, Jim Winstead wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 01:25:07PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> > On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > > Which means it has nothing to do with cleaning the tree to a
> > > distribution state (or state 'ready for distribution'
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 02:01:15PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Sunday 02 September 2001 10:28, Jim Winstead wrote:
>...
> > it may be worth following the gnu project's lead on these targets,
> > since they use the same names.
> >
> > http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards_55.html#SEC55
> >
> > (for
On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 12:15:33PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 3:22 AM
>
> > I use distclean on my computer all the time. Along with extraclean. Neither
> > of those targets should toss config.nice. *That* is what
On Sunday 02 September 2001 01:22, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 09:16:15PM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > On Friday 31 August 2001 19:31, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > > From: "Greg Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 9:30 PM
> > >
> > > > On Fri, Aug 31,
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 08:15:08AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Sunday 02 September 2001 01:22, Greg Stein wrote:
>...
> > I use distclean on my computer all the time. Along with extraclean. Neither
> > of those targets should toss config.nice. *That* is what I mean.
> >
> > To be clear: nothing
20 matches
Mail list logo
