On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 07:23:08AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > Why isn't this being detected by autoconf? SysV semaphore support
> > isn't perfect yet and has some problems.
>
> Because this is Apache 1.3 which doesn't use autoconf. :-)
This is my brain -= sleep. :)
-aaron
> From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:31:44AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > does everybody agree that this is preferable?
>
> Why isn't this being detected by autoconf? SysV semaphore support
> isn't perfect yet and has some problems.
Because this is
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:31:44AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> does everybody agree that this is preferable?
Why isn't this being detected by autoconf? SysV semaphore support
isn't perfect yet and has some problems.
-aaron
> Index: src/include/ap_config.h
> ===
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 10:31:44AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> does everybody agree that this is preferable?
>
> Index: src/include/ap_config.h
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/include/ap_config.h,v
> retrieving revision 1
Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> does everybody agree that this is preferable?
>
> Index: src/include/ap_config.h
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/apache-1.3/src/include/ap_config.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.323
> diff -u -r1.323 ap_config.h
> --
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:42:33AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > I would have thought you would add
> >
> > #if defined __OpenBSD__
> > #define HAVE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT
> > #endif
> >
> > since you have flock too.
> >
> > If you want to
Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > Why the "#else" part? Does OpenBSD lack flock() or is it because of
> > the new 'chroot' that your version does, but the .org doesn't. If the
> > latter, I'd prefer allowing both with the official ASF code.
>
> oversight on our part.
> I just commited a fix.
>
> floc
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:22:54PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> flock works with out chroot, but we don't want www-writeable files inside
> the chroot, so we default to sysvsem.
flock works with our chroot, that is.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 09:18:34AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Henning Brauer wrote:
> >
> > sorry if this appears twice, first one seems not to have made it.
> >
> > we have sysvsem on OpenBSD and applied the following patch to ap_config.h
> > in our tree - would be nice to have it in the ap
Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> sorry if this appears twice, first one seems not to have made it.
>
> we have sysvsem on OpenBSD and applied the following patch to ap_config.h
> in our tree - would be nice to have it in the apache.org tree as well. this
> is for apache 1.3.
>
> Index: src/include/ap
On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 08:42:33AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> I would have thought you would add
>
> #if defined __OpenBSD__
> #define HAVE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT
> #endif
>
> since you have flock too.
>
> If you want to force sysvsem be the default, add
>
> #define USE_SYSVSEM_SE
Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> we have sysvsem on OpenBSD and applied the following patch to ap_config.h
> in our tree - would be nice to have it in the apache.org tree as well. this
> is for apache 1.3.
>
> Index: src/include/ap_config.h
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
