From: Jeff Trawick
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 3/21/03 4:25 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove shmht from mod_ssl
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 10:45 AM 3/20/2003, you wrote:
>>I don't really see any point in putting any effort into the shmht
code;
>>shmcb has been the
Joe Orton wrote:
Has anyone done any testing of shmht in 2.0? It quickly stops caching
new sessions for me using Geoff Thorpe's swamp tool. If anyone does
want to put effort into getting it working, I've attached a patch which
contains some fixes: the conversion to the RMM code was not finished.
I
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 10:45 AM 3/20/2003, you wrote:
I don't really see any point in putting any effort into the shmht code;
shmcb has been the session cache of choice for a while (and it works
fine in 2.0 by my testing). I've attached a second patch which removes
shmht completely, whi
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 12:22:17PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
> At 10:45 AM 3/20/2003, you wrote:
> >I don't really see any point in putting any effort into the shmht code;
> >shmcb has been the session cache of choice for a while (and it works
> >fine in 2.0 by my testing). I've attached a seco
Hi there,
* William A. Rowe, Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> At 10:45 AM 3/20/2003, you wrote:
> >Has anyone done any testing of shmht in 2.0? It quickly stops caching
> >new sessions for me using Geoff Thorpe's swamp tool. If anyone does
> >want to put effort into getting it working, I've attac
At 10:45 AM 3/20/2003, you wrote:
>Has anyone done any testing of shmht in 2.0? It quickly stops caching
>new sessions for me using Geoff Thorpe's swamp tool. If anyone does
>want to put effort into getting it working, I've attached a patch which
>contains some fixes: the conversion to the RMM cod
