Re: 2.0.44 changes...

2002-12-02 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 11:27 AM 12/2/2002, Brad Nicholes wrote: >Any reason why the changes to the following source file should not be added to the >2.0.44 branch? > >modules/experimental/util_ldap.c That patch looks good... committed. >modules/experimental/util_ldap.dsp And this patch was very bad. Already rever

RE: 2.0.44 changes...

2002-12-02 Thread Brad Nicholes
I already took care of mod_cache.imp since it is a NetWare export list file. Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, December 02, 2002 4:08:34 PM >>> I'll take a look at the mod_cache

RE: 2.0.44 changes...

2002-12-02 Thread Bill Stoddard
I'll take a look at the mod_cache changes. Bill > -Original Message- > From: Brad Nicholes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 12:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 2.0.44 changes... > > > Any reason why the changes to the following source file should not

Re: 2.0.44 changes...

2002-12-02 Thread Jeff Trawick
"Brad Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Any reason why the changes to the following source file should not > be added to the 2.0.44 branch? ... > modules/generators/mod_cgi.c > modules/generators/mod_cgid.c ... > server/listen.c I'll try to merge these tonight. There is no sense in making