Ian Holsman wrote:
your welcome.
Thank you kind sir :)
Regards,
Graham
--
Graham Leggett wrote:
Joe Orton wrote:
The vote is in STATUS, the patch has been shown to work independantly by
one of the testers, could someone please add the last +1 so I can commit
this trivial fix.
Pretty please?
your welcome.
Regards
Ian.
Regards,
Graham
--
Joe Orton wrote:
If it just fails due to the "unpackaged files" check that's hardly a
showstopper, just do:
echo "%_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0" >> ~/.rpmmacros
You're asking end users to issue an arcane command to work around a bug
in the Apache supplied specfile. The real fix is to fix th
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 02:27, Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Given the number of +1s I felt comfortable to move these.
The tarballs are now up at http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/,
so the mirrors can
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:36:33AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Chip Cuccio wrote:
>
> >>The trivial fix to make the above file build as an RPM is still
> >>outstanding, and requires one more +1 to apply it.
>
> >I built RPMs with no issues for Fedora and RH 7.2 - 9.0.
> >Are you referring to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 29.06.2004 02:27:06
>Hi,
>
>The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
>Please test and cast your votes for release.
>
Compiles and runs fine under Windows 2000
+1 if I'm allowed to
André
On Jun 28, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Sander Striker wrote:
Please test and cast your votes for release.
Darwin 7.4 (MacOSX 10.3.4), prefork, the test suite gives me minor
barfage which I think is more on the test side than on the httpd side:
Failed Test Stat Wstat Total Fail Failed List o
Chip Cuccio wrote:
Ahhh - thanks ;-)
Shall I take a crack at it? How can we test the resultant spec?
The diff is attached - give it a try, tell me if it works. You need to
run ./buildconf to generate the httpd.spec from build/rpm/httpd.spec.in,
then tar up the archive and run
rpmbuild --rebuild
* Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:36:33AM +0200:
>
> No, I am referring to the spec file included in httpd v2.0.50, which is
> currently broken.
Ahhh - thanks ;-)
Shall I take a crack at it? How can we test the resultant spec?
Take care
--
Chip Cuccio
Chip Cuccio wrote:
The trivial fix to make the above file build as an RPM is still
outstanding, and requires one more +1 to apply it.
I built RPMs with no issues for Fedora and RH 7.2 - 9.0.
Are you referring to the libpcre hack?
No, I am referring to the spec file included in httpd v2.0.50, whic
* Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 04:17:01AM +0200:
>
> Sander Striker wrote:
>
> >The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
> >
> > http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
> >
> >Please test and cast your votes for release.
>
> The trivial fix to make the
Sander Striker wrote:
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
The trivial fix to make the above file build as an RPM is still
outstanding, and requires one more +1 to apply it.
Any takers?
Regards,
G
On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 02:27 +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> Please test and cast your votes for release.
Good On FreeBSD 5.2.1
* Sander Striker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|__ Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:27:06AM +0200:
>
> Please test and cast your votes for release.
Builds and works very well on;
- Red Hat Linux 7.2, 7.3, 8.0, & 9.0
- Fedora Core Linux 1, & 2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, & 3.0
- Slackware Linu
Sander Striker wrote:
The 2.0.50 tarballs are up and available for testing at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please test and cast your votes for release.
The update to apr_strings.c after rc2 isn't correct AFAICT (apr_snprintf()
doesn't return negative). I don't see that it hurts, as the sp
15 matches
Mail list logo
