On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
> I have been developing an application using apache 2.2 on linux 2.6. My test
> environment creates a very heavy workload and puts a strain on every thing.
>
> I would get good performance for a while and as the load ramped up,
> performan
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
>
>> I have been developing an application using apache 2.2 on linux 2.6. My
>> test environment creates a very heavy workload and puts a strain on every
>> thing.
>>
>> I would get go
: Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:43 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance fix in event mpm
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
>
>> I have been developing an application using apache 2.2 on linu
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> David Dabbs
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:43 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Performance fix in event mpm
>
>
> On
: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 12:43 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance fix in event mpm
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
I have been developing an application
8:58 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Performance fix in event mpm
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I was going to submit it as a backport, yes.
I have a strong feeling that this can explain the weird performance
issues/behavior we've seen when hitting any bottleneck that res
think we'd need to do anything other than
> throw a lot of load at it, right?
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Niklas Edmundsson [mailto:ni...@acc.umu.se]
> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 8:58 AM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
>
emory usage - I have about 130K per connection, which seems
much too big.
Jim
From: Jim Jagielski
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thu, February 3, 2011 7:19:34 AM
Subject: Re: Performance fix in event mpm
I've run SMOKE tests and not seen any discernibl
Looping in APR as well...
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Jim Van Fleet wrote:
>>
>>> I noticed that ap_queue_pop removes elements from the queue LIFO rather
>>> than FIFO. Also not
