Re: WXP

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:24 AM > Ben Hyde wrote: > > > > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > > There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't > > > know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP? > > > What *is* the answer

RE: WXP

2002-02-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
] San Francisco, CA > -Original Message- > From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 6:24 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: WXP > > Ben Hyde wrote: > > > > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > > There&#x

Re: WXP

2002-02-04 Thread Stipe Tolj
Ben Hyde wrote: > > Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't > > know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP? > > What *is* the answer? > > "Not known not to work." at least our Cygwin 1.3 based port of 1.3.x works on Windows

Re: WXP

2002-02-04 Thread Ben Hyde
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't > know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP? > What *is* the answer? "Not known not to work."

Re: WXP

2002-02-02 Thread Stipe Tolj
Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Does *anything* "run" on Windows XP?? :) Cygwin 1.3.x port of 1.3 at least *seems* to run on WinXP, but I haven' tested long run processes here, so don't beat me for failures. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- W

Re: WXP

2002-01-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
Does *anything* "run" on Windows XP?? :) Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > There's a FAQ I'm getting more and more to which I don't > know the answer; to wit, does Apache 1.3.* run on Windows XP? > What *is* the answer? > -- > #ken P-)} > > Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/