Hi!
I too am wondering when 2.2 binaries will be available?
Any news?
cheers - Warren
-Original Message-
From: Sierk Bornemann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 4:45 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Win32 Port of Apache 2.2?
Hi!
Is there any reason for
Or how about official 2.2 windows source files to start with?
,
Josh.
> -Original Message-
> From: Warren Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 2:36 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Win32 Port of Apache 2.2?
>
>
> Hi!
>
Fenlason, Josh wrote:
Or how about official 2.2 windows source files to start with?
They've been there how many months now? Help yourself to another cup
of coffee :)
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/
From: Warren Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I too am wondering when 2.2 binaries wi
Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 3:29 PM
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Win32 Port of Apache 2.2?
>
>
> Fenlason, Josh wrote:
> > Or how about official 2.2 windows source files to start with?
>
> They've been there ho
Fenlason, Josh wrote:
Where are the 2.2.x windows source files? I see
httpd-2.2.0-win32-src-rev2.zip. I've successfully built with these, but
sure didn't feel like an "official" source release. (I can't remember
for sure what issues I had with it since I last built over a month ago.)
Because
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
When Apache declares some tarball 2.2.0 released, it never changes.
It won't
change until a 2.2.1 is released. And 2.2.1 has not been released due
to bugs
that affect *ALL* platforms, not just your preferred platform.
Just to be clear, Josh and I (who are coworkers
Jess Holle wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
When Apache declares some tarball 2.2.0 released, it never changes.
It won't
change until a 2.2.1 is released. And 2.2.1 has not been released due
to bugs
that affect *ALL* platforms, not just your preferred platform.
Just to be clear, Josh an
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jess Holle wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
When Apache declares some tarball 2.2.0 released, it never changes.
It won't
change until a 2.2.1 is released. And 2.2.1 has not been released
due to bugs
that affect *ALL* platforms, not just your preferred platform.
@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Josh Fenlason
Subject: Re: Win32 Port of Apache 2.2?
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Jess Holle wrote:
>> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>> When Apache declares some tarball 2.2.0 released, it never changes.
>>> It won't
>>> change until a 2.2.1 is r
Warren Lewis wrote:
OK...now that we got that out of the way. :-) Any thoughts on when 2.2.1 might
be
released and official binaries will be made available for win32?
See SHOWSTOPPERS. Bullet one is patched, and likely apr/apr-util will be tarred
up in the next day or so after two of the pla
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
See SHOWSTOPPERS. Bullet one is patched, and likely apr/apr-util will be tarred
up in the next day or so after two of the platform maintainers get done clubbing
apr/test/testall errors into submission. I already answered bullet two on this
same thread, read back a w
11 matches
Mail list logo
