> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:43 PM
> At 12:37 PM 3/5/2004, Allan Edwards wrote:
>
> >Looks like MSDEV fooness to me. I changed nothing in the project except
> >adding the eoc file but I can't coax MSDEV into including /incremental:no
> >i
At 12:37 PM 3/5/2004, Allan Edwards wrote:
>Looks like MSDEV fooness to me. I changed nothing in the project except
>adding the eoc file but I can't coax MSDEV into including /incremental:no
>in the dsp even though it *is* there in the Link Project Options box.
this is why I always add sources (i
> From: Allan Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 7:38 PM
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >>>uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes is the default but you have
> >>>to pound it into the msdev's head. please fix/revert.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> -# ... /dll /incrementa
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes is the default but you have
to pound it into the msdev's head. please fix/revert.
-# ... /dll /incremental:no /debug /machine:I386
/base:@"os\win32\BaseAddr.ref",libhttpd.dll /opt:ref
+# ... /dll /debug /machine:I386 /base:
At 01:33 PM 3/4/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 12:04 PM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
>At 12:00 PM 3/4/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
>>
>>>/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove
flags that it finds redundant, even ones that it
At 12:04 PM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
>At 12:00 PM 3/4/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
>>
>>>/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove flags that it finds
>>>redundant, even ones that it added itself. It's a bit schizophrenic like t
At 12:00 PM 3/4/2004, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
>/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove
flags that it finds redundant, even ones that it added
itself. It's a bit schizophrenic like that.
uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes
At 09:55 AM 3/4/2004, Greg Marr wrote:
>/incremental:no is the default, and MSDev will at times remove flags that it finds
>redundant, even ones that it added itself. It's a bit schizophrenic like that.
uh wrong. with /debug incremental yes is the default but you have
to pound it into the
At 09:09 AM 3/4/2004, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:49:52PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ake 2004/03/01 09:49:52
>
> Modified:.libhttpd.dsp
> Log:
> add eoc_bucket.c to project
I'm not qualified to review Win32 changes but did you mean to remove
/increme
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 05:49:52PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ake 2004/03/01 09:49:52
>
> Modified:.libhttpd.dsp
> Log:
> add eoc_bucket.c to project
I'm not qualified to review Win32 changes but did you mean to remove
/incremental:no from the linker flags here as
At 01:39 AM 7/18/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>wrowe 2002/07/17 23:39:06
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.49 +134 -154 httpd-2.0/libhttpd.dsp
David... I knocked out the header you pointed out, along with a number
of duplicated entries for the headers we now move about into includ
I like! Will do some testing on NT 4.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 11:16 AM
Subject: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 libhttpd.dsp
> wrowe 02/05/24 08:16:53
>
> Modified:.libhttpd.dsp
> Log:
> We
12 matches
Mail list logo
