On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 01:29:35AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/contrib/patches/1.3/daemontools.patch
This should give you an official place to download it. I
have also added a note in 1.3's STATUS.
Btw, the above patch no longer applies cleanly to
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 07:49:34PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 07:21:16AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 05:26:44PM -0500, Michael Handler wrote:
hi, guys. i've posted this patch for foreground/supervise support
FWIW, by just eyeballing this
Sorry for the lack of quick response, I had to go home for a family
funeral.
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-0. I personally believe that this shouldn't be backported. If
you want this, you should use 2.0. Others will disagree vehemently
though, and you may indeed garner
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 04:00:34AM -0500, Michael Handler wrote:
I completely understand the desire to not to introduce substantial
changes into 13* at this point, as well as encouraging people to
test the stability and correctness of 20 However:
I have added it to our contrib section for
From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 28 February 2002 10:30
To: Michael Handler
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: daemontools/foreground support in 1.3.*
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 04:00:34AM -0500, Michael Handler wrote:
I completely understand the desire
On Thu, 2002-02-28 at 04:00, Michael Handler wrote:
This is a tiny change, and the functionality already exists in 20
Lots of sysadmins are going to be stuck with 13* for a while from
now, and this is a clear benefit to those of us who utilize
daemontools, without causing any harm to anyone
| I am of the mind that it should not be added, but I won't stop anyone
| if they garner 3 +1s from actual testing and feedback.
Anyone willing to step up with any +1s? It's an easy compile and test,
folks; just remember to run it under a shell without job control.
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 01:03:33AM -0500, Michael Handler wrote:
| I am of the mind that it should not be added, but I won't stop anyone
| if they garner 3 +1s from actual testing and feedback.
Does my +1 count?
--
Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Justin Erenkrantz:
-0. I personally believe that this shouldn't be backported. If
you want this, you should use 2.0.
I tend to agree. -0 from me as well.
There will always be a nice feature which could be backported,
but
At 05:05 AM 2/26/2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
According to Justin Erenkrantz:
-0. I personally believe that this shouldn't be backported. If
you want this, you should use 2.0.
I tend to agree. -0 from me as well.
There will
I agree with Dirk-Willem. I'm much less sympathetic to the it's time
to move on arguments these days. I think we have given 2.0 plenty of
headroom. 1.3 won't die out for a very long time and we can be nice
about that. Of course 2.0 should get the vast majority of our calories.
1.3 is very
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 05:26:44PM -0500, Michael Handler wrote:
hi, guys. i've posted this patch for foreground/supervise support
FWIW, by just eyeballing this patch I can say it looks good. It is
exactly how I would have done it.
-aaron
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 07:21:16AM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 05:26:44PM -0500, Michael Handler wrote:
hi, guys. i've posted this patch for foreground/supervise support
FWIW, by just eyeballing this patch I can say it looks good. It is
exactly how I would have done
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 05:26:44PM -0500, Michael Handler wrote:
hi, guys. i've posted this patch for foreground/supervise support
in the 1.3.* tree four times since january fifth (when the thread
for support for this in 2.0 started), and i haven't heard word one
back from anyone with commit
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMHO, 1.3 should be in bug-fix mode only. No new features - as
witnessed by our addition of AcceptMutex which screwed up 1.3.23
on Solaris. If you need this functionality, why not use 2.0 and
help us get 2.0 to be GA?
My SNAFU with no -lpthread
15 matches
Mail list logo
