RE: mod_cgi and apr_setup_signal_thread

2004-04-20 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
-Madhu >-Original Message- >From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 4:55 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: mod_cgi and apr_setup_signal_thread > > >Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote: >> I'm using the worker MPM for

RE: mod_cgi and apr_setup_signal_thread

2004-04-13 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
iginal Message- >From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 4:55 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: mod_cgi and apr_setup_signal_thread > > >Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote: >> I'm using the worker MPM for both mod_cgi and mod_cg

Re: mod_cgi and apr_setup_signal_thread

2004-04-13 Thread Jeff Trawick
Mathihalli, Madhusudan wrote: I'm using the worker MPM for both mod_cgi and mod_cgid. I don't see any httpd 2.0/apr 0.9 code which manipulates SIGALRM. Can you give me a pointer?

RE: mod_cgi and apr_setup_signal_thread

2004-04-12 Thread Mathihalli, Madhusudan
I'm using the worker MPM for both mod_cgi and mod_cgid. I haven't tried prefork MPM - but I have a vague guess that the problem will not show up in the prefork case. -Madhu From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 4/12/2004 4:23 AM To: [EMAIL