Completely understand. Of course, the fun part IS the development! :)
Perhaps I should defer to the list or anyone else that wants to chime in?
I suspect most users of any such module would prefer to put a cache in
front of itthis just makes the most sense to me.
Anyone else care to inpu
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Michael Montero wrote:
> My main concern would be with how expensive ImageMagick calls can be and
> the need to call both mogrify and convert (in my experience) to get a
> single thing done to an image. I would much rather read an image into
> memory and then perform a host of
Cliff, thanks for the reply. I read this:
"mod_ext_filter presents a simple and familiar programming model for
filters. With this module, a program which reads from stdin and writes to
stdout (i.e., a Unix-style
filter command) can be a filter for Apache. This filtering mechanism is
much slowe
I know Gerald Richter has a mod_perl module that does what you are describing.
might be worth a peek.
perldoc Apache::ImageMagick
sterling
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Cliff Woolley wrote:
> regenerated every single time. Given those two, I bet you could get this
> functionality having to actually write a new module. :)
Um, I seem to have lost a "WITHOUT" in there somewhere. ;]
--Cliff
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Michael Montero wrote:
> Hello! Wondering if anyone is working on/interested in a module that
> wraps the ImageMagick functionality? I'm thinking it would be used as
> such:
>
>
Just as a hint, mod_ext_filter and mod_cache in Apache 2.0 would likely be
helpful for this. mo
