On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Manni Wood wrote:
> OK, so almost a month ago, Cliff Woolley, Sander Holthaus, John K.
> Sterling, and Jeff Trawick all encouraged me to change the mod_usertrack
> patch I submitted so that instead of relying on a regexp to correctly
> find the cookie in the cookie header (why
"Manni Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> 1. I looked into the cookie RFC, which refers to the HTTP RFC on what
> the definition of a quoted value is. Interestingly, a quoted value is
> not allowed to contain quotes, not even escaped quotes. Can someone
> correct me on my assumption if I a
On Mon, 10 Mar 2003, Manni Wood wrote:
> 1. I looked into the cookie RFC, which refers to the HTTP RFC on what
> the definition of a quoted value is. Interestingly, a quoted value is
> not allowed to contain quotes, not even escaped quotes. Can someone
> correct me on my assumption if I am wrong
-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 6:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Manni Wood wrote:
> Kind of funny. While reading all these helpful e-mails, I was telling
> myself "so rea
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Manni Wood wrote:
> Kind of funny. While reading all these helpful e-mails, I was telling
> myself "so really, what I need to do is build some sort of state
> machine..." and there the phrase was in your latest e-mail.
> OK, so with everybody's help, I think I have everything
617 867 1881 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Most men would rather die than think. Many do."--Bertrand Russell
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
On Tue,
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Manni Wood wrote:
> Interesting you should mention this. An older version of the patch I
> wrote (I've been working on the problem off an on for over a year) did
> what you said: loop over the delimiters and parse each name=value pair
> into an apache table. Then, I asked the
yup, the = should also be escaped when in "".
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus
- Original Message -
From: "Manni Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:31 PM
Subject: RE: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
Yes,
ange XL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
There's still a small flaw here. Semicolons or comma's between "" should be
escaped.
- Original Message -
From: "Manni Wood&q
There's still a small flaw here. Semicolons or comma's between "" should be
escaped.
- Original Message -
From: "Manni Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:13 PM
Subject: RE: mod_usertrack bug
nd Russell
-Original Message-
From: John K. Sterling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 5:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:59:41 -0500 (EST)
&
>-- Original Message --
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:59:41 -0500 (EST)
>From: Cliff Woolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I'm still unclear why this requires a full-blown regex. Isn't all we
>really need to do to loop over the delimiters (semicolon and comma),
>remove whitespac
003 5:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Manni Wood wrote:
> So does this mean that you now agree that I should be using a regexp to
> find the cookie? I think that's what you mean.
I'm still unclear why this requires a full-blown regex
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 10:30 PM
Subject: RE: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
Sander,
So does this mean that you now agree that I should be using a regexp to find
the cookie? I think that's what you mean.
Also, thank you very much for reminding me that RFC
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Manni Wood wrote:
> So does this mean that you now agree that I should be using a regexp to
> find the cookie? I think that's what you mean.
I'm still unclear why this requires a full-blown regex. Isn't all we
really need to do to loop over the delimiters (semicolon and comm
think. Many do."--Bertrand Russell
-Original Message-
From: Sander Holthaus - Orange XL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
As a PERL-programmer, I cannot help you. What I can tell you is that your
- Original Message -
From: "Manni Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 9:13 PM
Subject: RE: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
I suppose I should have put more details at
http://www.manniwood.net/mod_usertrack
ED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 6:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_usertrack bugfix patch
Manni Wood wrote:
> I am submitting a patch to mod_usertrack for both Apache 2.0 and 1.3
> for your consideration.
> The patch fixes a bug where the use of strstr() to find the nam
> performance concern a.k.a. dumb question... is a regexp required for
> fixing this problem?
Same thought here. I do the same in PERL through substr instead of RegExp
'cause of the performance.
Kind Regards,
Sander Holthaus.
Manni Wood wrote:
I am submitting a patch to mod_usertrack for both Apache 2.0 and 1.3
for your consideration.
The patch fixes a bug where the use of strstr() to find the name of
the cookie in the cookieheader can accidentally "find" the name of the
cookie in what is actually the contents of a
20 matches
Mail list logo