On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
wrote:
>
>> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
>>
>> I'd prefer we use a define, eg:
>>
>> #define PROXY_WORKER_RFC1035_SIZE 512
>>
>> rather than embedding magic numbers...
>
> +1
Agreed, much better, committed in r1733056.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> Sent: Dienstag, 1. März 2016 12:58
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Cc: c...@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1732986 -
> /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/proxy/proxy_util.c
>
> I
I'd prefer we use a define, eg:
#define PROXY_WORKER_RFC1035_SIZE 512
rather than embedding magic numbers...
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 8:20 PM, yla...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Author: ylavic
> Date: Tue Mar 1 01:20:06 2016
> New Revision: 1732986
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1732986&vie