> From: Brian Pane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 17:01, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > I believe that the problem is platform specific. The reason that
loop
> > was added, was to allow for graceless shutdown on linux. On
non-linux
> > platforms, killing the main thread kills the w
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 09:44:03PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 17:01, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > I believe that the problem is platform specific. The reason that loop
> > was added, was to allow for graceless shutdown on linux. On non-linux
> > platforms, killing the main thread
On Sat, 2002-06-22 at 17:01, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> I believe that the problem is platform specific. The reason that loop
> was added, was to allow for graceless shutdown on linux. On non-linux
> platforms, killing the main thread kills the whole process, but on linux
> this doesn't work. The poin
I believe that the problem is platform specific. The reason that loop
was added, was to allow for graceless shutdown on linux. On non-linux
platforms, killing the main thread kills the whole process, but on linux
this doesn't work. The point of closing the sockets was to force the
worker thread
