On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 08:59:12AM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Does anyone see a reason not to resurrect REQUEST_CHUNKED_PASS?
I have no idea what you are talking about (your email is vague on context);
but we should certainly not reintroduce the kludges associated with
REQUEST_CHUNKED_PA
Does anyone see a reason not to resurrect REQUEST_CHUNKED_PASS?
The 'TraceEnable extended' semantics include the entire body
handshaking for bodies < 64kb (rejecting larger bodies as
memory hogs). The body = REQUEST_CHUNKED_PASS; line ensures
that the user sees the entire conversation.
This appe
