> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@;apache.org]
> Sent: 14 November 2002 18:36
> At 10:17 AM 11/14/2002, you wrote:
> >*or after tagging 2.0.44; that distinction isn't important to me; I
> >just want to get the ball rolling to move it out of experimental;
> >OtherBill, if a tag is still im
At 10:17 AM 11/14/2002, you wrote:
>*or after tagging 2.0.44; that distinction isn't important to me; I
>just want to get the ball rolling to move it out of experimental;
>OtherBill, if a tag is still imminent, then it will definitely move
>*AFTER* 2.0.44; there is no need to complicate matters;
W
At 11:17 AM -0500 11/14/02, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>Is anyone against moving it to modules/filters for 2.0.stable?
>
I'm +1 for it being "upgraded" to non-experimental status
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*or after tagging 2.0.44; that distinction isn't important to me; I
just want to get the ball rolling to move it out of experimental;
OtherBill, if a tag is still imminent, then it will definitely move
*AFTER* 2.0.44; there is no need to complicate matters;
This module has been used successfully b
