On Fri, 21 Jun 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Concerning this vulnerability: is safe to assume that a patched
> reverse proxy will protect a vulnerable back end server from such
> malicious requests?
I think that even unpatched Apache will protect backend - as all modules
that have deal with cl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Concerning this vulnerability: is safe to assume that a patched
> reverse proxy will protect a vulnerable back end server from such
> malicious requests?
I would imagine so, yes.
Regards,
Graham
--
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Concerning this vulnerability: is safe to assume that a patched
reverse proxy will protect a vulnerable back end server from such
malicious requests?
cu - Harry
> "jwoolley" == jwoolley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jwoolley> [[ Note: this issue affects both 32-bit and 64-bit
jwoo