Re: APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE

2002-01-22 Thread Doug MacEachern
i thought it was added as a workaround during one of the mod_ssl filter rewrites. during the last one i tried removing APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE from core.c and all tests in httpd-test passed except for protocol/echo and protocol/nntp_like (which are the same code in the place where the problem shows

Re: APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE

2002-01-22 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:36:47PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > > > Can someone please remind me why APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE is absolutely > > necessary? It's only being used in one place AFAICT (in core.c), and as > > far as I know, that just me

Re: APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE

2002-01-21 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:36:47PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > Can someone please remind me why APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE is absolutely > necessary? It's only being used in one place AFAICT (in core.c), and as > far as I know, that just means there's a bug we're patching around rather > than fix

Re: APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE

2002-01-21 Thread Greg Stein
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 10:36:47PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: > > Can someone please remind me why APR_BRIGADE_NORMALIZE is absolutely > necessary? It's only being used in one place AFAICT (in core.c), and as > far as I know, that just means there's a bug we're patching around rather > than fix