Re: Final draft / CVE-2011-3192

2011-08-25 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
Thanks. Added to the interim draft update. Dw. On 25 Aug 2011, at 06:36, Steffen wrote: For Mitigation of Apache Range Header DoS Attack with mod_security, see also: http://blog.spiderlabs.com/2011/08/mitigation-of-apache-range-header-dos-attack.html - Original Message -

Re: Final draft / CVE-2011-3192

2011-08-24 Thread Eric Covener
I'm seeing Apache 2.0 doesn't accept our RequestHeader syntax due to a defect, it misinterprets it as a value and fails startup. If we have the opportunity to amend, I think we need to suggest the rewrite flavor for Apache 2.0 and earlier, not just 1.3 and earlier. Also for 1.3, is our RE safe

Re: Final draft / CVE-2011-3192

2011-08-24 Thread Dirk-WIllem van Gulik
That is fine - we can do another update tomorrow, say noon zulu - if we expect that we do not have a proper patch and/or a 2.0.65 / 2.2.20 in the day following. Weird though - my 2.0.61 and 64 does seem fine. So probably very early 2.0 series. Dw On 24 Aug 2011, at 20:40, Eric Covener wrote:

Re: Final draft / CVE-2011-3192

2011-08-24 Thread Steffen
For Mitigation of Apache Range Header DoS Attack with mod_security, see also: http://blog.spiderlabs.com/2011/08/mitigation-of-apache-range-header-dos-attack.html - Original Message - From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel To: