Lars Kruse wrote:
Hi,
the attached patch adds a second option for non-anonymous binds to the
authnz_ldap module. Please consider it for adoption.
I've applied it to 2.2.14 today and tested on windows (AD).
It can't bind if the exact ldap folder is unknown.
Let's say we have users not in OU=Us
> In addition,
> the modifications to the binddn are in the 'sec' variable which is an
> authn_ldap_config_t structure created for the module and not for the
> _request_.
good catch, this is also a defect on one of the handful of patches in bugzilla!
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
On 26 Jan 2010, at 4:44 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
This new behaviour covers the two use cases described above (even
though I did
not check it in an Active Directory setup).
Patch is nice and simple, but it would be great if someone with AD
leanings could confirm that this combination of HTTP u
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Lars Kruse wrote:
>
>> This new behaviour covers the two use cases described above (even though I
>> did
>> not check it in an Active Directory setup).
>
> Patch is nice and simple, but it would be great if s
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Lars Kruse wrote:
> This new behaviour covers the two use cases described above (even though I did
> not check it in an Active Directory setup).
Patch is nice and simple, but it would be great if someone with AD
leanings could confirm that this combination of HTT
