On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 15 Jun 2013, at 12:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Anyone opposed if I commit to trunk?
>
> +1 to commit to trunk, that's where this stuff takes shape :)
+1
On 15 Jun 2013, at 12:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Anyone opposed if I commit to trunk?
+1 to commit to trunk, that's where this stuff takes shape :)
Regards,
Graham
--
Anyone opposed if I commit to trunk?
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 06:04:36PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > re-looking at this, it would be nice if we could abstract
> > out the callback itself as simply "some event", where
> > the callback and
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> re-looking at this, it would be nice if we could abstract
> out the callback itself as simply "some event", where
> the callback and the baton itself is self-contained
> enuff to define what the event is... eg register_anevent_callback :)
F
re-looking at this, it would be nice if we could abstract
out the callback itself as simply "some event", where
the callback and the baton itself is self-contained
enuff to define what the event is... eg register_anevent_callback :)
I'm a big +1 on Eric folding this into trunk!
On 07 Jun 2013, at 2:55 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Yeah, I think conn_rec would make sense if we were a single-threaded
> server, but considering the hybrid that we are, the real thing we're
> concerned about are the raw sockets. This also makes more sense
> with things like SPDY, iirc.
The reas
On Jun 5, 2013, at 10:45 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>> On 05 Jun 2013, at 3:00 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>>> I've been playing with this in my sandbox, it adds a "socket readable"
>>> callback to event, similar to the timed callback, whic
On Jun 5, 2013 7:33 PM, "Graham Leggett" wrote:
>
> On 05 Jun 2013, at 3:00 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> > I've been playing with this in my sandbox, it adds a "socket readable"
> > callback to event, similar to the timed callback, which allows
> > mod_proxy_wstunnel to hop on and off the thread l
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 05 Jun 2013, at 3:00 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> I've been playing with this in my sandbox, it adds a "socket readable"
>> callback to event, similar to the timed callback, which allows
>> mod_proxy_wstunnel to hop on and off the thread
On 05 Jun 2013, at 3:00 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> I've been playing with this in my sandbox, it adds a "socket readable"
> callback to event, similar to the timed callback, which allows
> mod_proxy_wstunnel to hop on and off the thread like test/mod_dialup.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~covener/
11 matches
Mail list logo
