So, why were we using pconf???
:)
Seems like we've fixed a bug anyways.
david
> On Tuesday 08 January 2002 08:49 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:30:16PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > dreid 02/01/08 08:30:16
> > >
> > > Modified:server main.c co
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:30 AM
> 1.127 +2 -1 httpd-2.0/server/core.c
>
> Index: core.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-2.0/server/core.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.126
> r
On Tuesday 08 January 2002 08:49 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:30:16PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dreid 02/01/08 08:30:16
> >
> > Modified:server main.c core.c
> > Log:
> > This small patch modifies the log's to use plog instead of pconf.
> >
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:30:16PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > dreid 02/01/08 08:30:16
> >
> > Modified:server main.c core.c
> > Log:
> > This small patch modifies the log's to use plog instead of pconf.
> > Basically pconf is cleared at different times from plog, an
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 04:30:16PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> dreid 02/01/08 08:30:16
>
> Modified:server main.c core.c
> Log:
> This small patch modifies the log's to use plog instead of pconf.
> Basically pconf is cleared at different times from plog, and this
> has
