Re: httpd-2.2.x and C89... ;-(

2017-01-07 Thread NormW
G/A and apologies for the delay...I'm not on the net 24/7... Yes, a 'clean' and 2.2.x build goes to completion without issue. Norm On 8/01/2017 12:29 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 1:35 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: Great catch, thanks Norm. That too is part of the r1753592 backp

Re: httpd-2.2.x and C89... ;-(

2017-01-07 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 1:35 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Great catch, thanks Norm. That too is part of the r1753592 backport > proposal, hoping someone is willing to look at these proposals. Now backported to 2.2.x (r175), along with other accepted "SNI" patches. Norm, does it work for you?

Re: httpd-2.2.x and C89... ;-(

2017-01-07 Thread Jan Ehrhardt
NormW in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Sat, 7 Jan 2017 11:31:32 +1100): > D:\Projects\svn\httpd-2.2.x>svn diff > Index: modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c > === > --- modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c (revision 1777591) > +++ modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c (

Re: httpd-2.2.x and C89... ;-(

2017-01-06 Thread William A Rowe Jr
Great catch, thanks Norm. That too is part of the r1753592 backport proposal, hoping someone is willing to look at these proposals. On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 6:31 PM, NormW wrote: > G/M > Did a test build of the 2.2.x tree and all builds nicely with exception of > the following; if release is 'in