* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:09 PM +0100 André Malo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Another question: I guess, the change does require an MMN bump,
>> doesn't it?
>
> Well, I'm not real sure if we consider core_dir_config a part of our
> public structures. I
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:09 PM +0100 André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Another question: I guess, the change does require an MMN bump,
doesn't it?
Well, I'm not real sure if we consider core_dir_config a part of our
public structures. I really don't see
--On Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:09 PM +0100 André Malo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another question: I guess, the change does require an MMN bump,
doesn't it?
Well, I'm not real sure if we consider core_dir_config a part of our
public structures. I really don't see why a module would be play
* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:32 AM +0100 André Malo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to let someone review before committing, because it's at
>> least a bunch of core changes.
>
> Looks good upon cursory review. I think we could optimize some of
> t
--On Wednesday, January 15, 2003 2:32 AM +0100 André Malo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to let someone review before committing, because it's at
least a bunch of core changes.
Looks good upon cursory review. I think we could optimize some of
the socket calls (short read/write cases), b
* Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> --On Monday, January 13, 2003 1:13 AM +0100 André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> hmm, I'd like to move the ident code out of core into a separate
>> module, say "mod_ident", since it's a feature, which is hardly
>> used in more than 1% of the cases, where th
