Hi,
first of all, sorry that it took me so long to review at this.
The current pre_access hook is executed before opening the htaccess
and then can abort the request with a HTTP error code.
Wouldn't a hook for opening the htaccess file make more sense because
it would have more possible use ca
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 11:57:54AM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Wouldn't a hook for opening the htaccess file make more sense because
> it would have more possible use cases? Then modules could use this
> hook to find htaccess files somewhere else, generate/extend/filter
> them on the fly, etc
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, sorry that it took me so long to review at this.
>
> The current pre_access hook is executed before opening the htaccess
> and then can abort the request with a HTTP error code.
>
> Wouldn't a hook for opening the htacc
I like the idea as well... The only issue I see is wondering
if/when we'll have the implementation.
On Jun 25, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, sorry that it took me so long to review at this.
>
> The current
Jim Jagielski schrieb:
>I like the idea as well... The only issue I see is wondering
>if/when we'll have the implementation.
>
>On Jun 25, 2013, at 9:12 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Stefan Fritsch
>wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> first of all, sorry that it took me so long t
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 11:57:54AM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Wouldn't a hook for opening the htaccess file make more sense because
> > it would have more possible use cases? Then modules could use this
> > hook to find htaccess
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:53:03AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> Do you have time to test with this patch on top of 2.4.x and report back?
>
> http://people.apache.org/~sf/open_htaccess_hook.patch
Hi,
I've tried this, adjusted mpm-itk, and it seems to work. Why do I need to
return AP_DECLINED and
On 10.07.2013 13:14, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:53:03AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> Do you have time to test with this patch on top of 2.4.x and report back?
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~sf/open_htaccess_hook.patch
>
> Hi,
>
> I've tried this, adjusted mpm-itk,
On Wednesday 10 July 2013, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> I don't like all that much having to duplicate the “official” hook
> (in particular the ap_make_full_path() call), but I guess it's
> better than what used to be there, and it's only two lines.
Yes, that's the price to pay for the more flexi
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 July 2013, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > I don't like all that much having to duplicate the “official” hook
> > (in particular the ap_make_full_path() call), but I guess it's
> > better than what used to be there, and it's
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:07:56PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> I guess "it seems to work" in the earlier e-mail is the validation that the
> API is sufficient for MPM-ITK.
Hi,
I see that 2.4.6 has been released, with no mention of open_htaccess in the
source code. Was this reverted after 2.4.5?
Am Montag, 22. Juli 2013, 19:58:11 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:07:56PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > I guess "it seems to work" in the earlier e-mail is the validation
> > that the API is sufficient for MPM-ITK.
> I see that 2.4.6 has been released, with no mention
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Am Montag, 22. Juli 2013, 19:58:11 schrieb Steinar H. Gunderson:
> > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:07:56PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > > I guess "it seems to work" in the earlier e-mail is the validation
> > > that the API is sufficient for
13 matches
Mail list logo
