On 6/8/15 10:17 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> In this example, the patch was enhanced and the original reviewers' efforts
> were thrown away. It's a shame to waste the limited review cycles.
>
> Moving forwards, can we please do two things. 1) retain the original patch
> and
> vote in the STATU
I've noticed this happening more and more often...
http://httpd.markmail.org/search/?q=+list%3Aorg.apache.httpd.cvs+%22vote+discarded%22
Here's one arbitrary example - there are many committers implicated here...
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS (original) +++
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/ST
