On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 11:24 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ondrej Sury wrote:
Just a thought... Wouldn't it be possible to solve this by extending
HTTP to support something similar to STARTTLS from IMAP/SMTP?
Dudes, it's already published in http://rfc.net/rfc2818.html - yet it
On 11/09/2005 11:38 AM, Ondrej Sury wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 11:24 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ondrej Sury wrote:
[..cut..]
Alternate approach is to use Server Name Indication TLS extension as
specified by: http://rfc.net/rfc3546.html and covered by
Does anybody know if the
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 11/09/2005 11:38 AM, Ondrej Sury wrote:
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 11:24 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Ondrej Sury wrote:
[..cut..]
Alternate approach is to use Server Name Indication TLS extension as
specified by: http://rfc.net/rfc3546.html and covered by