On 6/8/05, Dr. Peter Poeml [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:57:39AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:04:03 +0100, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody to wonder about this bug ?
sure; note that you're using old code (2.0.49/2.0.49) which isn't
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:57:39AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:04:03 +0100, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody to wonder about this bug ?
sure; note that you're using old code (2.0.49/2.0.49) which isn't
supported here anyway since we don't know what code is in
Nope, there are still in the usual location /etc/apache2/server-tuning.conf
I didn't understand the problem evocated by Jeff since the Apache
server used in Suse is the one from the ASF (in contrario of IBM HTTP
Server powered by Apache found on iSeries and pSeries which derive
from ASF code but
On 6/8/05, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, there are still in the usual location /etc/apache2/server-tuning.conf
I didn't understand the problem evocated by Jeff since the Apache
It is very simple: A user has a concern about the operation of the web
server and I want to try to help
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:08:35AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 6/8/05, Dr. Peter Poeml [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:57:39AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:04:03 +0100, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody to wonder about this bug ?
Dr. Peter Poeml wrote:
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:08:35AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 6/8/05, Dr. Peter Poeml [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 05:57:39AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:04:03 +0100, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody to wonder
Suse like many others major Linux distributions do not follow the
release rate since they should be sure that they won't break anything
in their users/customers settings after jumping from 2.0.49 to say
2.0.54.
To resume the question from Peter, who is the Suse Apache rpm
mainteners, was more to
Nobody to wonder about this bug ?
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:45:36 +0100, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all,
Apache 2 (2.0.48/2.0.49) got problems at restart time (SIGUSR1) when
rotating its log.
[Thu Feb 24 04:15:11 2005] [notice] Apache/2.0.48 (Linux/SuSE)
configured --
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:04:03 +0100, Henri Gomez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody to wonder about this bug ?
sure; note that you're using old code (2.0.49/2.0.49) which isn't
supported here anyway since we don't know what code is in it (SuSE)
It's seems the problem occurs will Apache receive the
Well the only module not distributed in apache2 distro is mod_jk
(another ASF module).
Well I'll try to upgrade my production systems with 2.0.53 and latest
mod_jk (1.2.9-dev).
Thanks Jeff
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 05:57:39 -0500, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:04:03
Hi to all,
Apache 2 (2.0.48/2.0.49) got problems at restart time (SIGUSR1) when
rotating its log.
[Thu Feb 24 04:15:11 2005] [notice] Apache/2.0.48 (Linux/SuSE)
configured -- resuming normal operations
[Fri Feb 25 04:15:15 2005] [notice] SIGUSR1 received. Doing graceful restart
Syntax error on
11 matches
Mail list logo
