--On Tuesday, September 9, 2003 9:56 AM -0400 Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody have a firmer grasp on the semantic differences between old APR
and new APR for hostname=NULL/family=APR_INET? If so, then perhaps
server/config.c needs to be changed to just create an all-zeros
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
I tagged the trees today, as STRIKER_2_0_48_PRE1 and STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE1
respectively. I'll try and get some tarballs up for testing, but
for now, please test the tag.
with recent apr resolver changes, Apache on AIX has picked up the old
assert failure
Sander Striker wrote:
I tagged the trees today, as STRIKER_2_0_48_PRE1 and STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE1
respectively. I'll try and get some tarballs up for testing, but
for now, please test the tag.
2.0.48:
needs apr/network_io/unix/sockaddr.c r1.43.2.1 to fix an init
failure on AIX
it would be nice
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 09:49:54 +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
I tagged the trees today, as STRIKER_2_0_48_PRE1 and STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE1
respectively. I'll try and get some tarballs up for testing, but
for now, please test the tag.
Both are currently broken on OS/2 from the recent max mem free stuff
Sander Striker wrote:
I tagged the trees today, as STRIKER_2_0_48_PRE1 and STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE1
respectively. I'll try and get some tarballs up for testing, but
for now, please test the tag.
with recent apr resolver changes, Apache on AIX has picked up the old
assert failure that solaris-8
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 8:27 PM
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Brian Havard wrote:
Both are currently broken on OS/2 from the recent max mem free stuff. Looks
like I have to turn on AP_MPM_WANT_SET_MAX_MEM_FREE for it to compile
without error
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I tagged the trees today, as STRIKER_2_0_48_PRE1 and STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE1
respectively. I'll try and get some tarballs up for testing, but
for now, please test the tag.
Looks good on RedHat 9 with worker. I didn't do anything special to change
thread libraries, so I
* Sander Striker wrote:
I tagged the trees today, as STRIKER_2_0_48_PRE1 and STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE1
respectively. I'll try and get some tarballs up for testing, but
for now, please test the tag.
Win32:
after fixing the aprutil.dsp typo, 2.0.48 compiles fine, but abs.exe (using
openssl 0.9.7b
Hi,
I tagged the trees today, as STRIKER_2_0_48_PRE1 and STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE1
respectively. I'll try and get some tarballs up for testing, but
for now, please test the tag.
Thanks,
Sander
provider of Net business solutions
http://www.novell.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Saturday, September 06, 2003 1:49:54 AM
Hi,
I tagged the trees today, as STRIKER_2_0_48_PRE1 and
STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE1
respectively. I'll try and get some tarballs up for testing, but
for now, please test the tag.
Thanks
10 matches
Mail list logo