This was the patch Victor was asking if you would verify...
http://home.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/httpd-2.2.x-r1753592.patch
That should be resolving the late declaration bug.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 8:18 PM, NormW wrote:
> G/A
> I'm building the 2.2.x svn source tree, not a tag...
> Norm
>
>
>
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:06 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> In hopes that someone might review this weekend, I'll wait until first
>> thing Monday to tag and roll, but won't be delaying this any further.
>> This also gives me a chance to ensur
G/A
I'm building the 2.2.x svn source tree, not a tag...
Norm
On 7/01/2017 1:09 PM, NormW wrote:
G/A
As of 2 mins ago...
Building D:/Projects/svn/httpd-2.2.x/modules/proxy
Calling NWGNUproxy
CC mod_proxy.c
### mwccnlm Compiler:
#File: mod_proxy.c
#
#1093:
G/A
As of 2 mins ago...
Building D:/Projects/svn/httpd-2.2.x/modules/proxy
Calling NWGNUproxy
CC mod_proxy.c
### mwccnlm Compiler:
#File: mod_proxy.c
#
#1093: int post_status = proxy_run_post_request(worker, balancer,
r, conf);
# Error: ^^^
#
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017, at 08:13 PM, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote:
> Sigh. Missed the SHOWSTOPPER from the C89 thread.
>
Wait a sec; re-reviewing that patch...Norm's issue should be
addressed with the backport of r1753592.
Norm - could you re-try that compile with Yann's backport?
Best,
Victor
--
V
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017, at 08:11 PM, Victor J. Orlikowski wrote:
>> *) mod_proxy: Correctly consider error response codes by the backend when
>> processing failonstatus. PR 59869
>> Trunk version of patch:
>> http://svn.apache.org/r1753592
>> Backport version for 2.4.x of
On Fri, Jan 06, 2017, at 06:06 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> PATCHES PROPOSED TO BACKPORT FROM TRUNK:
> [ New proposals should be added at the end of the list ]
>
> *) mod_proxy: Correctly consider error response codes by the backend when
> processing failonstatus. PR 59869
> Tru
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:06 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> In hopes that someone might review this weekend, I'll wait until first
> thing Monday to tag and roll, but won't be delaying this any further.
> This also gives me a chance to ensure it is building on AIX, once my
> build environment is re
Folks,
Since there are many fewer pairs of eyeballs on this branch, I've completed
builds across Linux, Windows, Solaris and HPUX (and trying to salvage my
AIX environment that went sideways). One of my $dayjob teammates offered
to jump in, so he's been able to review 2.2.32-dev plus the followin