Re: Thoughts on 2.0.32

2002-02-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 5:52 PM > > Since it sounds like Win32 is busted (I'd say it'd be fine to > > say that .31 is beta but doesn't work on Win32, but wrowe doesn't > > like that), > > IMNSHO, .31 should be released as a beta, with the understan

RE: Thoughts on 2.0.32

2002-02-04 Thread Ryan Bloom
> Since it sounds like Win32 is busted (I'd say it'd be fine to > say that .31 is beta but doesn't work on Win32, but wrowe doesn't > like that), IMNSHO, .31 should be released as a beta, with the understanding that it doesn't work on Win32. That is a PITA, but it wouldn't be the first time that

Thoughts on 2.0.32

2002-02-04 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
Since it sounds like Win32 is busted (I'd say it'd be fine to say that .31 is beta but doesn't work on Win32, but wrowe doesn't like that), how about just taking the .31 tree, tagging *that* as .32, and carefully bumping files that resolve issues into .32 and the RM can carefully decide which othe