Scroll back a half hour :)
Seriously - do folks need the extra day - or does anyone object to Friday
midday?
Paul Querna wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
>> start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
>> I offer to be RM.
>
> I think we sho
while we are on the subject to of apr...May i ask why the lib's have a 1 appended to it in 2.2.x? Most (read nearly all) 3rd party modules link to the old filename.JorgeOn 11/8/06,
Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:> Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should> star
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should
start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments?
I offer to be RM.
I think we should start thinking about it too. I think we should also
consider requesting that APR{,-Util} 1.2.8 gets done by the APR
developers...
With