Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

I'll do a T&R on Monday then... This give as the weekend, just in case. > On Sep 23, 2017, at 7:39 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Eric Covener wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> We can wait. No reason to rush if we can hold off for

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> We can wait. No reason to rush if we can hold off for a bit >> and ensure that 2.4.28 is as ready to go as possible. > > Since the C-L issue is not a (recent) regression, I would just a

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > We can wait. No reason to rush if we can hold off for a bit > and ensure that 2.4.28 is as ready to go as possible. Since the C-L issue is not a (recent) regression, I would just as well bank the aging CVE fix now with a release rather than

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

We can wait. No reason to rush if we can hold off for a bit and ensure that 2.4.28 is as ready to go as possible. > On Sep 22, 2017, at 1:23 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> STATUS looks clean. >> >> Hoping to do a T&R this afternoon, ea

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > STATUS looks clean. > > Hoping to do a T&R this afternoon, eastern, unless I hear > any objections or concerns re: timing. svn looks good here. Only one potentially missed item IMO, it could wait till 2.4.29, but if we hear right back from j

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

STATUS looks clean. Hoping to do a T&R this afternoon, eastern, unless I hear any objections or concerns re: timing. Cheers!

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

Looks like we need 1 more vote on it for it to be folded in on time for 2.4.28. > On Sep 19, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > There have been no issues w/ that on trunk... will > fold into 2.4 and do some stress testing over the next > 2 days. > >> On Sep 19,

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

There have been no issues w/ that on trunk... will fold into 2.4 and do some stress testing over the next 2 days. > On Sep 19, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG > wrote: >> >> Do we get this one into 2.4.28? >> >> https://b

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > > Do we get this one into 2.4.28? > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956 Proposed for backport now, will see... Regards, Yann.

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

> Am 19.09.2017 um 15:50 schrieb Jacob Perkins : > > > >> On Sep 18, 2017, at 11:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> Seems like a good time to push for a 2.4.28 T&R by end-of-week. >> Review STATUS! Test and Vote on backports! >> >> Comments? Do we get this one into 2.4.28? > https://bz.apac

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

+1 — Jacob Perkins Product Owner cPanel Inc. jacob.perk...@cpanel.net Office: 713-529-0800 x 4046 Cell: 713-560-8655 > On Sep 18, 2017, at 11:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Seems like a good time to push for a 2.4.28 T&R by end-of-week. > Review STATUS! Tes

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Seems like a good time to push for a 2.4.28 T&R by end-of-week. > Review STATUS! Test and Vote on backports! > > Comments? +1

Re: Time for 2.4.28 ?

On 09/18/2017 06:24 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Seems like a good time to push for a 2.4.28 T&R by end-of-week. > Review STATUS! Test and Vote on backports! > > Comments? > +1!

Time for 2.4.28 ?

Seems like a good time to push for a 2.4.28 T&R by end-of-week. Review STATUS! Test and Vote on backports! Comments?