Let's commit to pushing for a 2.3.11-BETA...
On 10.02.2011 15:27, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Let's commit to pushing for a 2.3.11-BETA...
I would certainly welcome that - what about the two (small) patches I
proposed about three weeks ago? Original message attached, for easier
reference.
Kaspar
--- Begin Message ---
On 17.01.2011 15:27, Dr Step
On Thursday 10 February 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Let's commit to pushing for a 2.3.11-BETA...
+1
One question: How do we handle truly experimental modules (e.g.
mpm_simple, mod_serf). Move them into an experimental subdir before
branching or branch first and then move stuff around? Or just
7:32 -0500
Subject: Time to start planning for httpd 2.3.11-BETA ?
Let's commit to pushing for a 2.3.11-BETA...
mod_authn_socache_winbuild .diff
Description: Binary data
elski
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:27:32 -0500
Subject: Time to start planning for httpd 2.3.11-BETA ?
Let's commit to pushing for a 2.3.11-BETA...
awk_full_module_list.diff
Description: Binary data
gt;
> So if there are no objections I'd like to have it added.
>
> Regards,
>
> Gregg
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 09:27:32 -0500
> Subject: Time to start planning for httpd 2.3.11-BETA ?
>
> Let's commit to pushing for a 2.3.11-BETA...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:20:49 -0800
"Gregg L. Smith" wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> In the spirit of beta, could we get the last missing module that I know of,
> mod_authn_socache, in the Windows build? Reading it's doc it sounds like a
> good module to have if using dbd for authentication.
Should be
On 2/12/2011 10:14 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Thursday 10 February 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Let's commit to pushing for a 2.3.11-BETA...
>
> +1
>
> One question: How do we handle truly experimental modules (e.g.
> mpm_simple, mod_serf). Move them into an experimental subdir before
> br
On 2/14/2011 12:21 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:20:49 -0800
> "Gregg L. Smith" wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> In the spirit of beta, could we get the last missing module that I know of,
>> mod_authn_socache, in the Windows build? Reading it's doc it sounds like a
>> good module to
On Feb 14, 2011, at 5:00 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 2/12/2011 10:14 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>> On Thursday 10 February 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Let's commit to pushing for a 2.3.11-BETA...
>>
>> +1
>>
>> One question: How do we handle truly experimental modules (e.g.
>> mpm_si
I think we're about ready... My plan is to T&R 2.3.11-beta the start
of next week, allowing this week for some final touches...
On Feb 10, 2011, at 9:27 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Let's commit to pushing for a 2.3.11-BETA...
>
On 22 Feb 2011, at 17:13, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I think we're about ready... My plan is to T&R 2.3.11-beta the start
> of next week, allowing this week for some final touches...
Remind me, at what point does the API freeze?
Regards,
Graham
--
On 2/22/2011 9:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 22 Feb 2011, at 17:13, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> I think we're about ready... My plan is to T&R 2.3.11-beta the start
>> of next week, allowing this week for some final touches...
>
> Remind me, at what point does the API freeze?
When 2.3-beta b
On Feb 22, 2011, at 10:45 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 2/22/2011 9:43 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>> On 22 Feb 2011, at 17:13, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>>> I think we're about ready... My plan is to T&R 2.3.11-beta the start
>>> of next week, allowing this week for some final touches...
>>
14 matches
Mail list logo
