> Is everybody OK with sending e-mail notifications for CI failures for
> trunk to this list?
+1
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Le 23/04/2020 à 12:20, Joe Orton a écrit :
In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI caught them - and one
false negative (where the gcc 9 build broke because of some change in
the Ubuntu repo). So I think we're
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 1:39 PM Stefan Eissing
wrote:
>
> > Am 23.04.2020 um 12:23 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
> >
> >
> >
> > On 4/23/20 12:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> >> In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
> >> Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI
> Am 23.04.2020 um 12:23 schrieb Ruediger Pluem :
>
>
>
> On 4/23/20 12:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
>> In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
>> Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI caught them - and one
>> false negative (where the gcc 9 build broke
On 4/23/20 12:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
> Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI caught them - and one
> false negative (where the gcc 9 build broke because of some change in
> the Ubuntu repo). So I think
In the past two weeks we've had three true negative build failures from
Travis on trunk - i.e. bugs were introduced and CI caught them - and one
false negative (where the gcc 9 build broke because of some change in
the Ubuntu repo). So I think we're reaching the point where signal is
