Virtual Hosts & FCGI paths, was Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_fcgid-2.3.1?

2009-09-21 Thread Paul Querna
Hi, I spoke a little too soon, there is one problem. mod_fcgid correctly uses the VirtualHost as one of the unique inputs for each backend daemon. (Sidenote: This virtualhost code is *only* present in the unix process manager, which means there is a separate bug/issue in the win32 process manage

Re: Virtual Hosts & FCGI paths, was Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_fcgid-2.3.1?

2009-09-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.09.2009 09:11, Paul Querna wrote: > While, this is obviously a terrible thing for a general purpose > module, I would like to propose that we add a 'FCGIIgnoreVirtualHost' > configuration option, which would set the vhost field to a constant > value, so FCGI processes would be shared between

Re: Virtual Hosts & FCGI paths, was Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_fcgid-2.3.1?

2009-09-21 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 21.09.2009 09:11, Paul Querna wrote: > > While, this is obviously a terrible thing for a general purpose > > module, I would like to propose that we add a 'FCGIIgnoreVirtualHost' > > configuration option, which would set the vhost field to a

Re: Virtual Hosts & FCGI paths, was Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_fcgid-2.3.1?

2009-09-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.09.2009 09:11, Paul Querna wrote: > (Sidenote: This virtualhost code is *only* present in the unix process > manager, which means there is a separate bug/issue in the win32 > process manager code) I compared the two spawn functions and made them more consistent in r817237 (both now using the

Re: Virtual Hosts & FCGI paths, was Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_fcgid-2.3.1?

2009-09-21 Thread Rainer Jung
On 21.09.2009 13:41, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:01 AM, Rainer Jung > wrote: > > On 21.09.2009 09:11, Paul Querna wrote: > > While, this is obviously a terrible thing for a general purpose > > module, I would like to propose that we